<entry id="2182525" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2242670</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>能力値</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>のうりょくち</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>ability score (in role-playing games, etc.)</gloss>
<gloss>attribute value</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2007-12-20 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-28 11:19:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;ability score (as in RPGs)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;ability score (in role-playing games)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-29 03:28:55" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;vidg;&lt;/field&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-30 00:20:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's also used in tabletop games. Is vidg appropriate?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-30 01:20:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Maybe we could rename that tag to "gaming" to make it less media-specific.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-30 21:32:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In modern usage, "gaming" almost always refers to video games. I don't think we should expand the scope of the field tag.
I suspect that nowadays 能力値 is mostly used in the context of video games. The question is whether this is enough to justify a vidg tag.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-01 01:01:03" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree about not changing the field tag scope.
Probably best to drop the tag and make the gloss a bit more general.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-&lt;field&gt;&amp;vidg;&lt;/field&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;ability score (in role-playing games)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;ability score (in role-playing games, etc.)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>