<entry id="2180547" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1004200</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>けど</reb>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>けども</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<pos>&prt;</pos>
<gloss>but</gloss>
<gloss>however</gloss>
<gloss>although</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-08-21 09:18:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daijr: 〔「けれど」の転。関西方言的な言い方〕「けれども（接続）」に同じ。
津軽語辞典, 高松の方言, 奥豊後の言葉
and mentions online of it being 名古屋弁 and 神奈川県方言 too.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;けんど&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-08-21 09:44:36" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-08-01 18:17:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>luce</upd_name>
<upd_detl>looks better in length order
けど→けれど→けれども</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>n-grams
けど	8533540
けれども	698416
けれど	1564784
けども	143097
けんど	2637</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+&lt;reb&gt;けれど&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
@@ -12,4 +15,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;けれど&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-08-01 19:52:37" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>spec1 on けれども seems redundant</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-26 11:48:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I suggest splitting out けれど,けども けれども</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-12 03:57:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I was waiting for a case to be made. Both GG5 and ルミナス simply point けど to their けれど(も) entries. I don't think a split is needed.
GG5 has a second sense with the explanaion "〔単に接続的に, あるいは特別の意味なしに〕".  A little hard to gloss.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-12 06:26:22" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>different levels of politeness. different registers. 　けれども and けれど should probably be [pol] or [form] tagged.
it's not like けど can just be replaced with any of the others in any sentence (or vice versa). It's like having だ and です in the same entry (which we previously did in んだ and んです but we ended up splitting it). I just think it's confusing.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs
[補説]「けれども」は中世末、形容詞活用の已然形語尾に接続助詞「ども」が付いてできたもの。近世前期になると、くだけた感じを伴う「けれど」「けど」が生じ、後期には、「けども」が成立した。

https://hinative.com/ja/questions/168002
丁寧さの違いです。
↑ていねい
「けれども」
「けれど」
「けども」
「けど」
↓ていねいではない
敬語を使う相手には、上の二つを使います。
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/1968834
けれどもはけどより丁寧です</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-05 05:58:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>So move out けれど and けれども, and leave the others? I'll set that up and see if it works.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>けど	264538469
けれど	25837638
けれども	12292892
けども	3084936
けんど	52699</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,8 +6,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;けれど&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;けれども&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_pri&gt;ichi1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-06 19:16:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>けんど is 関西方言 according to daijr. I'll make a separate entry for it.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;けんど&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>