<entry id="2180402" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1012370</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ムズムズ</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>むずむず</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
<gloss>to itch</gloss>
<gloss>to feel itchy</gloss>
<gloss>to feel creepy</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
<gloss>to be impatient</gloss>
<gloss>to itch (to do something)</gloss>
<gloss>to be eager</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-10-09 13:53:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>pupchurch</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Upchurch</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Hits in order: 2.7M, 1.6M</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ムズムズ&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-10-09 23:30:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-20 02:44:55" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-20 03:35:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-20 23:24:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's an adverb.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to itch&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to itch&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;on-mim;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-21 00:33:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Why remove the transitivity info? It pertains to the vs, whether or not the word is also an adv (rather than a noun) doesn't seem relecant to me.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-21 00:35:36" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I thought we didn't put transitivity tags on adverb entries.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-21 01:07:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We haven't discussed this on github or elsewhere as far as I'm aware so I don't think that's an established policy as much as it's a function of Meikyo not tagging words like these as vs in the first place. 
I'm not seeing the point in leaving it out? Even if it's the case vs on adv are always vi (whixh I'm not sure is the case), I think this should be made explicit, our users shouldn't have to guess.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-21 21:10:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Many (if not most) する adverbs describe a state, functioning more like adjectives, either attributively as 〜（と)した or predicatively as 〜(と)している. I don't think transitivity tags would be appropriate in these cases. For the rest, they're probably not needed given that all する adverbs are intransitive (as far as I know), which should be clear from the glosses. If it's not clear, the glosses probably need improving.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-22 01:48:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>&gt;&gt; given that all する adverbs are intransitive (as far as I know)
Probably usually the case but not always. I don't mind marking these sorts of entries with vi/vt as appropriate.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>を勉強する	357061
を勉強して	661527
が勉強して	36788
に勉強して	223513
を調理する	30865
を調理して	24896
をムズムズして	24
がムズムズして	14883</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-22 06:31:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>(only ムズムズ on that list is what we're specifically talking about here)
I don't think there's an innate rule that says a スル adv can't be vt, although I'm hard-pressed to come up with one that isn't. But くんくん for example has one を-して example on reverso (out of 7). 
But even if there is indeed such a rule, and all of these スル adv can only be vi, I would expect that only a minority of our users would be aware of that, so I think we should still mark them as vi.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-28 01:47:37" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>As I said, I don't mind  vi tag here. I'll close to trim the list, and reopen for a while.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-28 01:47:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-01 23:59:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think vi on adverb entries is helpful in most cases. It doesn't tell you whether the word is used like a regular verb or just adjectivally as 〜した/〜している.
I wouldn't object to including it on entries where we lead with vs (like this one).</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-02 00:57:38" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. That's seems a reasonable approach.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>