<entry id="2180341" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2853865</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>フルベド</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>exocarp</gloss>
<gloss>epicarp</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-03-01 01:04:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Anthony Russo</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Note the existing entry for 外果皮. In the quoted book, the following two sentences appear:
- 外側の皮は、日本語だと外果皮というんだ。
- ちなみにミカンなどの外側の皮はラテン語で「黄色いもの」という意味で、「フルベド」と呼ばれているよ。
So it would seem that 外果皮 and フルベド are equivalent, and are rendered 'exocarp' in English.

(Note further that 'epicarp' is a synonym for 'exocarp', and so should appear alongside 'exocarp' in both entries.)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 13</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-01 01:29:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>フルベド is not in references, gets 0 n-grams and is only in a handful of WWW pages, all of which seem false positives (e.g. "full bed". I don't think it has a case for inclusion.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-01 06:07:48" stat="D">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The quote prsented says フルベド is Latin (prob "flavedo"), with no indication it's used in Japanese.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>