<entry id="2179120" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2831591</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>０型</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>ゼロ型</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ゼロがた</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2236450">Ｏ型</xref>
<gloss>type O blood</gloss>
<gloss>blood group O</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2017-02-25 16:57:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>we've got the three other blood types</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>jwiki(血液型)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-03-02 03:02:38" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-14 11:52:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>ゼロ型	1814
I think Ｏ型 is more common?</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;ゼロ型&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2236450"&gt;Ｏ型&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-14 11:55:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Ｈｍ. Is this really used for type O blood in Japanese?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-17 07:22:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Googling for ゼロ型 indicates it is. I see pages where people are told it's really alphabetic "O" not ゼロ, but it seems to be a not-uncommon thing.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-18 00:18:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Opencooper</upd_name>
<upd_detl>While other languages might use different terminology, our glosses should use the English terminology.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type: "Type O is often called 0 (zero, or null) in other languages."</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;type 0 blood&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;blood group 0&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;type O blood&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;blood group O&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-18 02:08:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-01 09:58:54" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I suspect this is at most a typo/OCR mishap in those cases it does refer to type 0 blood.
This is in no reference</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>google results for "０型" "血液"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-13 04:53:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>If it was just ０型 I'd happily ditch it, but with 1814 in the n-grams for ゼロ型, and that form relating to Ｏ型, I think it should stay.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-17 09:37:35" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The few entries about this are explanations saying that O型 was actually originally 0型. not in Japanese but in the original German. ゼロ型 can also refer to a number of different other things which becomes apparent if you google for "０型" -血液.
I don't think this can be called an established term meaning "type O blood" and having this as an entry can be misinterpreted. I wouldn't mind including ０型 as an iK in the O型 entry but it doesn't belong here as a separate entry.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-17 09:58:30" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, "ゼロ型" -"血液" confirms that too.  I'll add ０型 as an iK in the O型 entry as you suggest.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>