<entry id="2177814" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2575230</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>御出木偶</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>おででこ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&hist;</misc>
<gloss>doll used as part of a street performance (Edo period)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-08-31 02:06:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-09-01 05:13:40" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;type of doll used during the Edo period&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Edo period doll&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-03 12:42:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>it's not any type of Edo-period doll, it's a specific one. It strikes me as much better to phrase these as "odedeko (type of..."</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Edo period doll&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;hist;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Edo-period doll&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-04 21:53:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"odedeko" gets almost no relevant hits online. I think we should avoid romanisations unless they're at least somewhat common.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Edo-period doll&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;doll used as part of a street performance (Edo period)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-02-07 00:16:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>