<entry id="2174467" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1140460</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>リーク</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>leak (of information)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1560900">漏電</xref>
<gloss>leakage (of electricity)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-09-11 20:25:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The "leek" sense isn't in any of my refs but jwiki says "リークとも". Google Images also shows some leaks. Should we add リーク to the リーキ entry?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, daij, meikyo</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +11 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;leak&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;leak (of information)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;leek (edible plant, Allium porrum)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1560900"&gt;漏電&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;leakage (of electricity)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-11 21:26:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, I think so. I'll do it.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-15 02:30:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>mk only has vs on sense 1... is sense 2 vi or vt? or not vs at all?</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vt;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-16 14:48:04" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Appears to be intransitive.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>