<entry id="2174350" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1416720</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>棚卸し</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>棚卸</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>たな卸</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>たな卸し</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>店卸</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>棚おろし</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>店卸し</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>たなおろし</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>stocktaking</gloss>
<gloss>inventory count</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>faultfinding</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-08-31 01:52:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Unidic/ngrams.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;棚卸&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -8,1 +11,1 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;店卸し&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;たな卸&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -11,1 +14,1 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;棚卸&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;たな卸し&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -15,0 +18,6 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;棚おろし&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;店卸し&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-08-31 09:01:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i think the [iK] and [ik] should only be used to cover relatively widespread misunderstandings, not to cover mere typos that the writer would likely have caught if they had bothered to proofread</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>i seriously question 棚押し.  many hits are clearly edict derived or false positives. 押し is not read as おろし, and i think any native speaker would read 棚押し as たなおし, which (i'd guess) is the only way it'd ever be written that way: as a typo.
=
n-grams = 36</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -25,4 +25,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;棚押し&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-09-02 11:56:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-06-19 00:57:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>richwarm</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Richard Warmington</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -31 +31 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;stock taking&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;stocktaking&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-06-19 00:59:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-01 21:13:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added sense.
The JEs use 棚卸し in their example sentences.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog, daij
棚卸しを	        13029
棚卸を	        10477</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;棚卸&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;棚卸し&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -8 +8 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;棚卸し&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;棚卸&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -33,0 +34,5 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;faultfinding&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-01 21:23:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-15 08:53:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>棚卸し	157139
棚卸	238959
たな卸	62964
たな卸し	8135
店卸	3017
棚おろし	2616
店卸し	568

again, weird with 棚おろし not having an rK tag but being surrounded by rK tags on its right and left</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -30,0 +33,2 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vt;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -36,0 +41,2 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vt;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>