jmdict
1151470
Active
(id:
2174075)
<entry id="2174075" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1151470</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>悪化</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf04</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>あっか</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf04</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>deterioration</gloss>
<gloss>getting worse</gloss>
<gloss>worsening</gloss>
<gloss>aggravation</gloss>
<gloss>degeneration</gloss>
<gloss>corruption</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-11-17 22:36:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-14 09:27:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think this is adj-no
vi should follow vs (this is an issue in some entries where the vt,vi information was added automatically and another PoS, usu. adj-no, comes in between)</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-14 21:46:15" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog
悪化 2965248
あっ化 No matches</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>あっ化</keb>
@@ -23,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>(suffer) deterioration</gloss>
-<gloss>growing worse</gloss>
+<gloss>deterioration</gloss>
+<gloss>getting worse</gloss>
+<gloss>worsening</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-15 01:34:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>