<entry id="2173959" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1451850</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>同意</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf06</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>どうい</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf06</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>agreement</gloss>
<gloss>consent</gloss>
<gloss>approval</gloss>
<gloss>assent</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<gloss>same opinion</gloss>
<gloss>same view</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<gloss>same meaning</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-04-04 16:42:22" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"same meaning" sense isn't [vs].
Daijs splits "same opinion" into a separate sense. I think that's clearer.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;same opinion&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -23,0 +22 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;assent&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -27 +26,6 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;same opinion&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;same view&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-04 19:11:37" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-14 12:12:33" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>mk</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>