<entry id="2172649" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1526950</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>蔓延</keb>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf43</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>まん延</keb>
<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>蔓衍</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>まんえん</reb>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf43</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>spread (e.g. of a disease)</gloss>
<gloss>rampancy</gloss>
<gloss>infestation</gloss>
<gloss>proliferation</gloss>
<gloss>being widespread</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-12-19 12:16:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Keshav Kini</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Giving the definition more of the negative connotations of the original. Also shouldn't the definitions be in noun form, as with most other [vs] words?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>英辞郎</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;spread disease&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;spread (e.g. of a disease), rampancy, infestation, proliferation&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-12-19 16:50:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>-generally, vi/vt tags don't go [vs] entries.  even though they arguably 
could/should
-use semicolons rather than commas to separate glosses</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,2 +17,4 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;spread (e.g. of a disease), rampancy, infestation, proliferation&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;spread (e.g. of a disease)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;rampancy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;infestation&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;proliferation&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-03-05 04:19:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daijs</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;蔓衍&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-03-05 09:14:40" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-01-20 16:26:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Not Meiryo-Name</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>tsukuba:
    蔓延	1043	
  まん延	272
bccwj (nlb): 
    蔓延	92	
  まん延	12</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>prog3e; bccwj (nlb); tsukuba corpus</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;まん延&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -23,0 +27 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;being widespread&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-01-21 07:41:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-06 10:31:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I thought まん延 might have taken over 蔓延 recently because of the まん延防止措置 constantly being in the news but this doesn't seem to necessarily be the case (see google news search results for "蔓延する" vs まん延する”）</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>mk (2 senses)
蔓延	411236
まん延	44583
蔓衍	No matches

is 蔓衍 oK? is it in other refs?</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec2&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -22,0 +25 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-01-07 10:57:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I can see it in a couple of places.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>