<entry id="2169337" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2146030</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>カ行変格活用</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>カぎょうへんかくかつよう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&gramm;</field>
<gloss>irregular conjugation of the verb "kuru"</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2007-03-28 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-03-06 12:25:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%E5%8A%A0%E8%A1%8C%E5%A4%89%E6%A0%BC%E6%B4%BB%E7%94%A8%22</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;加行変格活用&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ateji;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-03-06 22:05:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Two matters I'd like to raise with this type of entry:
- are with comfortable with the "ateji" tag on the 加行... form? I don't mind, but maybe "oK" might be better.
- I think it's cleaner just to say "inflection" rather than "conjugation (inflection, declension)". Less cluttered and just as accurate.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;irregular conjugation (inflection, declension) of the verb "kuru"&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;irregular inflection of the verb "kuru"&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-03-07 21:36:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>- I think either works, but isn't it enough to have these forms on the か行/ら行/わ行 entries? I don't think we need them here.
- I'd go with "conjugation" given that it specifically refers to verbs. Declension is simply wrong (verbs don't decline).</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-03-10 06:43:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think the 加 version can go - people will find it in the 加行 abbreviation if they are curious. It gets a minute number of Googits - all in academic papers.
Yes, "declension" is wrong. I tend to use "inflection" these days as it's more general, but "conjugation" is fine for verbs of course.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;加行変格活用&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ateji;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -16 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;irregular inflection of the verb "kuru"&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;irregular conjugation of the verb "kuru"&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-14 03:08:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>GG5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;gramm;&lt;/field&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>