<entry id="2165850" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2851883</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>一身専属権</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>いっしんせんぞくけん</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&law;</field>
<gloss>non-transferable personal right</gloss>
<gloss>inalienable rights</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-11-23 11:41:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5 has   "inalienable rights"
but I think that might be wrong:
https://www.token.co.jp/estate/useful/archipedia/word.php?jid=00013&amp;wid=26704&amp;wdid=01</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-24 00:54:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's probably correct, in the legal application of "inalienable".</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;inalienable rights&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>