jmdict
1602010
Active
(id:
2159326)
<entry id="2159326" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1602010</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>一周</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf13</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>いっしゅう</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf13</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>one round</gloss>
<gloss>one circuit</gloss>
<gloss>one revolution</gloss>
<gloss>one lap</gloss>
<gloss>one turn</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2017-05-27 23:35:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Amen Lernsky</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>doesn't the 2 out of 3-rule apply here?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>eij</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-28 00:04:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Koj, Daijr and Daijs all merge 一周(り)/一巡り/ひとめぐり. The JEs split them, but for /一周いっしゅう GG5 adds "ひとめぐり".</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひと巡り</keb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-03 00:57:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Jim, according to daijr, daijs, and koj, the only reading for 一周 is いっしゅう. I'm not seeing a merge.
I think ひとめぐり needs to be a separate entry.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-04 12:12:28" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>AFAIK the ▽ in 一周▽り means that the り is optional.
Still I don't have a problem with splitting this up.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr: ひとめぐり 【一周▽り・一巡り】</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,6 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>一巡り</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ひと巡り</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18,7 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>一周</re_restr>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf13</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ひとめぐり</reb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-04 22:28:53" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"one full year" is 一周年.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>once around</gloss>
+<gloss>a round</gloss>
+<gloss>a circuit</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>a round</gloss>
-<gloss>one full year</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-06 10:22:19" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>restoring missing tags</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf13</re_pri></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-11 04:44:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>Shouldn't all these "a" be replaced with "one"?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-11 04:54:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it'd OK. The meaning is clear.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-11 15:03:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think "one" does look better here.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,5 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>a round</gloss>
-<gloss>a circuit</gloss>
-<gloss>a revolution</gloss>
-<gloss>a lap</gloss>
-<gloss>a turn</gloss>
+<gloss>one round</gloss>
+<gloss>one circuit</gloss>
+<gloss>one revolution</gloss>
+<gloss>one lap</gloss>
+<gloss>one turn</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-17 22:51:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>