jmdict
1540970
Active
(id:
2158662)
<entry id="2158662" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1540970</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>あり得る</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>有り得る</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>有りうる</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ありうる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2851621">ありえる</xref>
<gloss>possible</gloss>
<gloss>conceivable</gloss>
<gloss>likely</gloss>
<gloss>probable</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-05-16 02:52:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Merging.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 just points ありえる at ありうる.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有りうる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +17,6 @@
+<reb>ありうる</reb>
+<re_restr>有りうる</re_restr>
+<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
+<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +24,3 @@
+<re_restr>有りえる</re_restr>
+<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
+<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
@@ -21,0 +33,1 @@
+<gloss>to be probable</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-22 23:01:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Reopening for conversation, as something that ends in うる cannot be
considered [v1]. See for example the conjugation table entry for this, which
gives its formal negation as 有りうません, etc.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-24 09:53:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>paul</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Could we a) 'special case' a verb table for 有りうる or b) Not provide a [V] link for whatever POS we end up giving 有りうる.
I think a headword of 有り得 or 有りう would confuse people (me included ;-)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-27 11:55:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>How's this for ducking the verb aspect completely? It matches all the GG5 examples.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -29,5 +29,4 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to be possible</gloss>
-<gloss>to be likely</gloss>
-<gloss>to be probable</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>possible</gloss>
+<gloss>likely</gloss>
+<gloss>probable</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-27 16:53:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i think that's pretty much right. if they dodged using a verb as well, that's
definitely the way we should go. also adding [exp], because this can be used
at sentence-end. should we mark the ~える forms as [ik]? i believe that we
should based on the refs above as well as what i read when i was first
learning this grammar point</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijirin: 古語の下二段動詞「ありう」が、現代語でも~~~~~「ありえる」という形にな
らないで~~~~~、例外的に下二段活用を保っているもの
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1014242515</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -30,0 +30,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-28 00:10:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-06-23 20:30:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>luce</upd_name>
<upd_detl>- sorting headwords
- borderline [uk]</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>n-grams
有りうる 532
有りえる 143
有り得る 5022
あり得る 34190
ありうる 23699
ありえる 14493</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あり得る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有り得る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,6 +15,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>有り得る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>あり得る</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
+<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
@@ -19,2 +20,0 @@
-<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
@@ -23,0 +24,2 @@
+<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
+<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
@@ -25,2 +26,0 @@
-<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-06-23 23:12:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>FWIW here are the Google n-grams:
あり得る 540239
有り得る 109637
有りうる 9289
有りえる 4653
ありうる 401417
ありえる 405434</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-31 00:19:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not necessarily prenominal.
It does conjugate, but only with the える reading.
How do we want to handle this? A separate entry for each reading?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5: 彼にだって時には失敗もありうる. Even he can fail [make a mistake] sometimes.
chujiten: 彼女が僕を街で見かけたなんて断じてありえませんよ. It is absolutely [utterly] impossible that she saw me in town.
ありえません 328782</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-14 07:14:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think so. I'll set it up.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>有りえる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18,9 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>有りうる</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ありえる</reb>
-<re_restr>あり得る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>有り得る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>有りえる</re_restr>
@@ -30,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2851621">あり得る・ありえる</xref></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-15 13:21:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think we need adj-f when it's not always prenominal.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>chujiten</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>conceivable</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-15 13:58:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2851621">あり得る・ありえる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2851621">ありえる</xref></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>