<entry id="2156322" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2845740</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>加農</keb>
<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>カノン</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<lsource xml:lang="dut">kanon</lsource>
<gloss>cannon</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-07-25 20:06:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Split from 1037950.
I think 加農 should go in the kanji field.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, koj
G n-grams:
加農	1598</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-07-26 00:12:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ateji;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-07-26 01:48:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Two comments:
- 加農 is also read かのう in the related term 加農砲 (Koj, Daijr, GG5, here.)
- カノン also means the same as キャロム in billiards, but I think it's not a candidate for merging here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-07-26 02:20:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Reopening this to raise the question as to whether キャノン/cannon should be merged here.
The overlap of カノン, キャノン and キャロム is quite messy.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr: キャノン entry points to カノン, which says "「カノン砲」の略。 〔「加農」とも書く〕"
GG5: キャノン entry: (1) 【玉突き】 ＝キャロム.  (2) 【音楽】 ＝カノン.  Has the (billiards) キャノンショット as an example.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-07-26 11:41:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Given that カノン comes from Dutch whereas キャノン presumably comes from English, I think we should keep them separate.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-07-26 23:51:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i agree.  i fixed its xref so it points here</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-06 07:18:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1962640"&gt;カノン砲&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>