<entry id="2155405" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1109910</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>フェミニスト</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>feminist</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>man who indulges women</gloss>
<gloss>gentleman</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-05-17 08:50:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;man who indulges women (from feminist)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;lsource xml:lang="eng"&gt;feminist&lt;/lsource&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;man who indulges women&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-19 07:55:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-19 14:19:15" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;feminist&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -14,4 +17,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;feminist&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-19 23:02:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I suspect the 国語s are being historical/politically correct, and the JEs are reflecting actual usage. Certainly when I was first learning Japanese in the 80s it was emphasized that フェミニスト meant sense 1. Has it changed?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, 中辞典 (both have the original sense ordering.)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-20 07:36:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i agree.  all my kokugo dictionaries list the normal english meaning of 'feminist' first, but i've had real conversations in which people were genuinely confused when i used フェミニスト to mean what we normally call a 'feminist'.  i think the original ordering more accurately reflects modern usage vs. etymology</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-20 08:31:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, I'll reverse it rather tha rejecting, as it's worth keeping this dialogue intact.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;feminist&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -17,0 +14,4 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;feminist&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-02 09:09:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think sense 1 is def more common today. daijs leads with it</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>google results</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,3 +10 @@
-&lt;lsource xml:lang="eng"&gt;feminist&lt;/lsource&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;man who indulges women&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;gentleman&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;feminist&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -16 +14,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;feminist&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;man who indulges women&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;gentleman&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-03 09:24:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. I've reindexed the sentences.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>