<entry id="2153935" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2834302</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>チバニアン</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&geol;</field>
<gloss>Chibanian (geologic age)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-01-17 22:32:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>知恵蔵mini</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-18 15:15:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>should probably hold off on this.  it's not an accepted term
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/11/14/national/science-health/japan-based-name-chibanian-set-represent-geologic-age-last-magnetic-shift/</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-18 21:11:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Rather than have it hang around in limbo, I suggest making it "proposed", and when/if approved it can be updated.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +9 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Chibanian (geologic age)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Chibanian (proposed geologic age)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-27 11:04:36" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>officially ratified in January 2020.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Chibanian (proposed geologic age)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;geol;&lt;/field&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Chibanian (geologic age)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-28 00:22:21" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>