<entry id="2153750" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2851052</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>２０年代</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>にじゅうねんだい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>the '20s</gloss>
<gloss>the twenties</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-10-25 14:03:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>see ７０年代 entry</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-25 14:03:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;１２０年代&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;２０年代&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-26 00:09:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Before ticking these off, two questions:
- should we be a little wider in the explanation, e.g. for "the '30s" should it have "the '30s (1930s)" or "the '30s; the 1930s"?
- for the '10s and the '20s I wonder if it can mean more than one century. Depending on the context, '10s could mean the 1910s or the 2010s.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-26 00:22:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think keeping them simple and not including 
the century in the gloss is better - 
effectively it future-proofs them.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-26 04:12:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. JUst a thought. It should be clear from the 年代.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>