<entry id="2152040" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2441310</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>班田収授法</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>班田収授の法</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>はんでんしゅうじゅのほう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&hist;</misc>
<gloss>allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ritsuryō system)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2009-04-10 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-05-24 06:56:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Daijr</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ancient Japanese law)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ritsuryo system)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-05-24 12:28:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>daijs</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-27 21:35:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Lorenzi</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I've added a new heading for better correlation of kanji and reading.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8F%AD%E7%94%B0%E5%8F%8E%E6%8E%88%E6%B3%95</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7,7 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;班田収授の法&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;はんでんしゅうじゅほう&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_restr&gt;班田収授法&lt;/re_restr&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+&lt;re_restr&gt;班田収授の法&lt;/re_restr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-28 02:01:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Odd situation. We can:
- split into two entries
- leave it as  Lorenzi has proposed, although it's not our usual practice for format an entry this way
I had wondered about the はんでんしゅうじゅほう reading but it seems it's used.
I'm comfortable with just the one entry. Any other views?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Koj &amp; GG5: use 班田収授法 with the はんでんしゅうじゅ*の*ほう reading
Daijr &amp; ルミナス use 班田収授の法 as the kanji form, with the matching reading
班田収授法	1304
班田収授の法	366
はんでんしゅうじゅのほう	96
はんでんしゅうじゅほう	50</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-28 03:34:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>I don't think we should include the "はんでんしゅうじゅほう" (no の) reading if it's not in any of the sources. It's not THAT 
uncommon to see particles like の left out from the kanji form for older/historic words..</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;hist;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-28 06:29:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. The concealed の/が/etc. seem mostly to be in names.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;はんでんしゅうじゅほう&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_restr&gt;班田収授法&lt;/re_restr&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-&lt;re_restr&gt;班田収授の法&lt;/re_restr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-16 05:16:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>ritsuryo conv test
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ritsuryo system)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;allotment of rice paddies for cultivation during the cultivator's lifetime (ritsuryō system)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>