<entry id="2151855" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2205520</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>春秋時代</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しゅんじゅうじだい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&hist;</misc>
<gloss>Spring and Autumn period (of Chinese history; approx. 770-403 BCE)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2007-08-15 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-13 07:38:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;hist;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-13 14:36:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Do we normally tag xx時代 as [hist]? Not saying 
we shouldn't, but it's not obvious to me 
what's the best approach here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-13 23:13:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I see you added it to the 三韓 entry last year. Of the ~200 entries with this tag, I see quite a few are for historical periods like this. I think we need a clearer view on its use. I'll approve this for now, and raise an issue on the topic.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-15 12:12:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Spring and Autumn period (of Chinese history, approx. 770-403 BCE)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Spring and Autumn period (of Chinese history; approx. 770-403 BCE)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>