<entry id="2151065" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2556300</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>ヒョウ属</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ヒョウぞく</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>Panthera (genus comprising the tiger, lion, jaguar, leopard and snow leopard)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-07-08 08:05:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>James Rose</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>wiki</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-13 00:06:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-07 08:56:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Panthera (genus of the cat family Felidae containing tigers, lions, jaguars, and leopards)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Panthera (genus containing tigers, lions, jaguars, and leopards)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-08 17:12:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think the Oxford comma is needed for a simple list like this.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panthera</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Panthera (genus containing tigers, lions, jaguars, and leopards)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Panthera (genus comprising the tiger, lion, jaguar, leopard and snow leopard)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-09 00:08:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't have strong opinions on this topic but 
Jim has expressed a preference for the Oxford 
comma. My only preference is for consistency.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.rd.com/article/oxford-comma-
proper-use/
Well, appropriately enough, the Oxford 
Dictionary has the answer. The proper 
definition of the Oxford comma is “a comma 
used after the penultimate item in a list of 
three or more items, before ‘and’ or ‘or’.”</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-11 04:18:34" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Me? Oxford comma? 
Sorry if I gave that impression; I only use them if there's a need to avoid ambiguity. This is quite OK as you have it. (I didn't notice Jim Rose used one, or I would have trimmed it.)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-11 06:53:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>My bad. I checked my e-mail and see I asked about this on the mailing list in 2012 and you expressed the same sentiment back then: 
"I avoid it unless it's really needed."</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>