<entry id="2150334" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2205020</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>ラテン帝国</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ラテンていこく</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&hist;</misc>
<gloss>Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2007-08-15 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-22 22:34:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Just making clear it's not a reference to the Roman empire.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, Daijr</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261CE)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-26 12:44:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>CE is superfluous I think</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>jwiki</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261CE)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-29 02:53:22" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We've been using CE/BCE on almost all dates, e.g. 魏晋南北朝時代, 蜀漢, 和同開珎, 律令時代. Sure, something in Constantinople has to be CE, but I like consistency.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261 CE)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-29 06:06:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Surely not with dates from the 20th and 21st centuries?
Where do we draw the line? Before 1800?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-31 03:49:14" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>dunno.  probably a question for the mailing list rather than a random entry though.
--
for the record, wiki policy, which we sometimes follow, says:
"In general, do not use CE or AD unless required to avoid ambiguity (e.g. The Norman Conquest took place in 1066 not 1066 CE nor AD 1066) or awkwardness (January 1, 1 AD not January 1, 1). On the other hand, Plotinus was a philosopher living at the end of the 3rd century AD will avoid unnecessary confusion. Also, in He did not become king until 55 CE the era marker makes it clear that "55" does not refer to his age. Alternatively, He did not become king until the year 55. If the era is shown for the initial date in a range, then use it for the final date as well: either from 450 to 200 BCE or from 450 BCE to 200 BCE, but definitely from 100 BCE to 200 CE. (See § Ranges, below.)"</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-04 07:43:23" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;hist;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-06 23:49:39" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think we use CE for years after 999.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261 CE)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Latin Empire (Constantinople, 1204-1261)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-08 11:04:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>