<entry id="2149695" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2519900</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>イタチ科</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>イタチか</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>Mustelidae (family comprising the weasels)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2009-11-14 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-17 22:15:31" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Reading.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;いたちか&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;イタチか&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-03-21 02:52:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelidae&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelidae (weasel family)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-03-21 21:58:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-03-24 12:51:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>イタチ類</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelids&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-03-25 22:54:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Why? Mustelids is just the English for Mustelidae (Latin). Harmless. Useful for English lookups.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-03-26 00:42:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_detl>It's my understanding that X-ids refer to X類 rather than X
科, i.e. members of the 科, rather than the 科 itself. I 
thought I saw a 科 entry where Rene had removed the "X-id" 
gloss giving an explanation like that but I couldn't find it 
looking through entries ending in 科 now, so it might have 
been a different kind of entry. But if "mustelids" is 
accepted here, shouldn't ideally each 科 entry have an -"id" 
gloss as well?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-03-26 20:55:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, I agree that "mustelids" should not be a gloss.  (It refers to the animals themselves as opposed to the family.)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-13 09:56:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelidae (weasel family)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelidae&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;family comprising the weasels&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-13 10:59:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-07 01:10:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelidae&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;family comprising the weasels&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Mustelidae (family comprising the weasels)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>