<entry id="2149145" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2850619</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>保健所政令市</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ほけんしょせいれいし</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&law;</field>
<gloss>designated city or core city required to run its own public health centers</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-09-29 01:11:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>will revisit if nb else fixes before me</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>保健所政令市	1443</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 04:02:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I tried make it "designated city with public health center" but it's tricky.
I might be misremembering but was there some back and forth on whether to tag the single gloss of an entry as 
expl? Maybe it's something for the mailing list, but I think it's good to point out regardless of how many 
glosses an entry has.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>wiki
日本の地方公共団体のうち、地域保健法第5条第1項の規定により、保健所を設置できる政令指定都市、中核市、および政令で定め
る市をいう（広義）
"About 1,130 results" for "保健所政令市" site:go.jp
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jdh/67/4/67_292/_pdf
概要：本研究の目的は，保健所政令市および特別区における 1 歳 6 か月児歯科健康診査実施方法の現状と O2 型判定結
果との関連を検討することである．
　調査対象は全国の保健所政令市および特別区の 94 市区であり，...
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between current methods for
carrying out dental health examinations for 18-month-old children and type O2 evaluation results in 
designated cities and special wards with public health centers</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;?&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;law;&lt;/field&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;designated city or core city which is legally obligated to run its own public health centers&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-03 05:18:02" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Trimming.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;designated city or core city which is legally obligated to run its own public health centers&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;designated or core city required to run its own public health centers&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-03 23:56:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>From the editorial policy: "The "[expl]" tag is usually not used if it is the only gloss in the sense."
I think we should stick to this. JMdict is full of terms that are glossed using a short description/explanation rather than a translation and it hasn't caused any problems so far. I worry we'd run into consistency issues if we started using expl for some single-gloss entries but not for others.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-04 23:27:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Ok. 
I don't think "designated city" should be 
broken apart to "designated or ... city", it's 
a set term</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;designated or core city required to run its own public health centers&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;designated city or core city required to run its own public health centers&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>