<entry id="2148286" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1657650</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>催涙</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf20</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>さいるい</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf20</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1292260">催涙ガス</xref>
<gloss>tear-inducing</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-11-18 12:12:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Jeff Gedert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I've just encountered a case in an academic report where 催涙ガス was abbreviated to 催涙, but was still used to mean a type of gas.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;tear gas&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-11-20 21:57:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Gg5, Igaku, Eijiro, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17,8 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;lachrymal&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;lacrimator&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;dacryagogue&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;tear-inducing agent&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1292260"&gt;催涙ガス・さいるいガス&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;abbr;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-11-20 22:04:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In another fork Rene wrote: "we need a verifiable reference.  standalone use of 催涙 for 'tear gas' is in none of mine"
We already have:
催涙スプレー （さいるいスプレー） (n) tear gas defense spray (e.g. mace, pepper)
催涙銃 （さいるいじゅう） (n) tear-gas gun
I agree it's a fine line.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>RNN News glossary: "tear gas spray	催涙スプレー"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-11-28 07:12:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"催涙スプレーかけられて"　24 uniques
"催涙かけられて" 2 hits (duplicate of the same sentence)
"催涙スプレーをかけられたら"　19 hits
"催涙をかけられたら" 0
I think we need more evidence before we include 催涙 as an 
abbrev for tear gas</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-11-29 03:54:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>also since it's really only ever used as a prefix/adj, i suggest we gloss it as an adj.  (also, all of my sources list it as a "こと" not a "もの").  in other words, just:
===
[1][adj-no,n]
lachrymatory;lacrimatory;tear-inducing</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-12-03 04:19:47" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. I'll move the xref.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -16 +17 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1292260"&gt;催涙ガス・さいるいガス&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -21,6 +21,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1292260"&gt;催涙ガス・さいるいガス&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;abbr;&lt;/misc&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;tear gas&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 08:44:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Should we treat this as a noun instead? or adj-f?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>PoS gloss agreement


催涙のガス	No matches
催涙ガス	11988</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,3 +18 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;lacrimator&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;dacryagogue&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;tear-inducing agent&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;tear-inducing&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 11:34:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 14:32:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Opencooper</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Looks like adj-f to me? My refs (gg5, smk) have compounds as examples.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ngrams</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-30 01:58:23" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I have to agree.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>催涙	62743	  
催涙スプレー	32865	  
催涙ガス	11988	  
催涙弾	9776	  
催涙の	45</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15 +15 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-f;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-30 11:39:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We could probably drop n.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>催涙	62743
催涙を	29
催涙が	49</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1292260"&gt;催涙ガス・さいるいガス&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1292260"&gt;催涙ガス&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>