<entry id="2148068" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1420230</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>男優</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf17</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>だんゆう</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf17</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1345430">女優</xref>
<gloss>(male) actor</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2017-06-02 15:37:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Amen Lernsky</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>eij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;actor&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(male) actor&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-02 22:42:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;(male) actor&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1345430"&gt;女優・じょゆう&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;actor (male)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 06:48:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>Decided to change the definition as putting in "Male actor" does not make the term show up. Just changed it to make it easier to 
find.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;actor (male)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;male actor&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 07:30:34" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The term "actor" in English these days is gender neutral. The JEs tend to have actress or female actor for 女優.
My preference is to have "actor (male)" here, and if reverse searches are needed, have "actor; male actor" as the gloss.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>JEs - all have "actor".</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 11:37:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In a fork Marcus wrote: "I think "(male) actor" looks better than "actor (male)"?"
I agree that "(male) actor" looks better. It's unlikely that someone would look up "male actor". I don't think it's needed as a gloss.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1345430"&gt;女優・じょゆう&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;male actor&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1345430"&gt;女優&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(male) actor&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-29 11:55:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>