<entry id="2147367" stat="D" corpus="jmnedict" type="jmnedict">
<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>5743335</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>台風第１４号</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>たいふうだいじゅうよんごう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<misc>&ev;</misc>
<gloss>Typhoon Lorna (1954)</gloss>
<gloss>Typhoon Sarah (1959)</gloss>
<gloss>Typhoon Ruby (1985)...</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-09-17 05:32:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I'm wondering what the community thinks of adding entries like these. I think they could be very useful and on-topic. I deliberately left it incomplete but I can fill out the rest if people are receptive to the idea.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%B0%E9%A2%A8%E7%AC%AC14%E5%8F%B7</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-17 05:57:08" stat="D">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree they could be potentially useful but I 
would assume there's a number 14 every single 
year. Just adding a select few (rather then 
every typhoon ever given this name) would give 
the wrong impression. And these entries would 
end up out-of-date once every year (when 
there's a new one by the same name, which is 
also when people are the most likely to look 
it up). So I don't think this is a good idea.
(I'm deleting, but if anybody has more to say, 
including Nicolas of course, they are welcome 
to revive it)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-17 10:54:18" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Can we just leave it pending so more editors get the chance to see this?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-17 23:31:07" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>A few comments:
(a) it's not a "named entity" as such; it's a nomenclature system used in Japan for typhoons. A bit like "5th District Court" or "7th Congressional District".
(b) I can see it's probably useful to record it somewhere, but not here.  I can't see it really fitting into the main dictionary unless we were to put in the full range of 台風第NN号. After all, it's a bit obvious, especially its full form such as 平成5年台風第13号.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B9%B3%E6%88%905%E5%B9%B4%E5%8F%B0%E9%A2%A8%E7%AC%AC13%E5%8F%B7</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-22 06:19:23" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Regarding your second point, I wouldn't mind adding the other 台風第NN号 entries and keep them updated, if there's consensus to keep this. I don't see how it's obvious, though.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-22 06:48:59" stat="D">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>That's a pretty significant commitment, Nicolas, to keep all typhoon entries continually updated. 
Remember that JMDict has been around for 30 years and might very well be around for 30 more, if not more still.
I think this is the kind of thing that's more suited to other kinds of databases, like Wikipedia.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-22 08:05:54" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's the sort of thing you'd have on a Wiki page about typhoons, but I don't think it's really dictionary entry material.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>