<entry id="2147268" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2850423</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>性加害</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>せいかがい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<gloss>sexual assault</gloss>
<gloss>sexual abuse</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-09-10 01:57:30" stat="A" unap="true">
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-10 05:34:21" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>GT translates it as "sexual assault", which better matches 加害.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>性加害	212</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;sexual assault&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-10 06:12:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Does this look weird? I was thinking we could maybe also add "(becoming a victim of) sexual abuse" to the related 性被害</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;sexual abuse&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(perpetration of) sexual abuse&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-10 23:55:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think it's needed. If it were used, it's better on the first gloss, but the "assault" implies "perpetration of" anyway.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-21 04:46:33" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Closing</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;(perpetration of) sexual abuse&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;sexual abuse&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>