<entry id="2144428" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2849866</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>パイナポー</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>パイナッポー</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1101100">パイナップル</xref>
<misc>&col;</misc>
<s_inf>var. used for comic effect, etc.</s_inf>
<gloss>pineapple</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-07-10 02:13:28" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>See comments on 1101100.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>パイナポー	22213
パイナップル	841756
パイナッポー	5906</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-10 15:06:39" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>If we're going to include these versions, I 
don't think there's any reason thwy should be 
split out from the main pineapple entry.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-10 17:38:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think they should be included at all. We tend to ignore quirky forms like this.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-11 11:40:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>With 28k in the n-grams, I don't think they should be ignored. We have quite a ew quirky gairaigo.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-21 08:48:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Closing.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-22 00:43:33" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Should this really be a separate entry from パ
イナップル?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-22 00:50:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I feel it's best to keep this pair separate as they're really comic/quirky variants. If they were part of the パイナップル entry we'd need a comment to indicate their context and it would be a bit messy.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>パイナップル	841756
パイナポー	22213
パイナッポー	5906</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-22 22:34:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree with Marcus that they shouldn't be a separate entry. The note will probably confuse people.
I'm still of the view that these forms aren't needed. Can't they be added to the glossing file instead?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-17 00:33:41" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, I'll move them to the main entry as "ik" and leave it at that.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>