<entry id="2140411" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2850107</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>非電化</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ひでんか</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<gloss>non-electrified</gloss>
<gloss>unelectrified</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-08-07 13:31:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>非電化	41855</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6400968</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-07 22:10:34" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Could be two senses.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>KOD</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;non-electrified&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-08 16:54:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think "de-electrification" is right.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>非電化が	110
非電化を	141</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;de-electrification&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -14,0 +13 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;unelectrified&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-08 21:24:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-09 04:36:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Why not? It's 非+電化. The 化 tells us it's a process.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-09 10:11:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not in this case. In the article you posted, 非電化 is not referring to a process.
電化 isn't necessarily a process either (e.g. 電化製品).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>非電化する	No matches
非電化し	        No matches</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>