JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2850096 Active (id: 2133752)
<entry id="2133752" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2850096</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>小羸子</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>細螺</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しただみ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1663600">キサゴ</xref>
<misc>&arch;</misc>
<gloss>Umbonium costatum (species of sea snail)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-08-05 23:40:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>See discussion on 1663600.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>小羸子	&lt; 20
シタダミ	212
しただみ	489
Koj, Daijr/s</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-07 21:39:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Align.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;button top (Umbonium costatum) (species of sea snail)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Umbonium costatum (species of sea snail)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-07 22:30:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Any reason we can't tag this as archaic?
Also, can we make sure to create x-refs using the desired surface form as opposed to the sequence number (i.e. [see=キサゴ] instead of [see=1663600])? That way, obscure kanji forms aren't carried over.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,3 +15,2 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1663600"&gt;細螺・きさご&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;
-&lt;s_inf&gt;old term&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1663600"&gt;キサゴ&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-08 01:58:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I wasn't sure it was really "archaic". Sometimes an abandoned name may only be a few years in the past. 
I'll try and stick to selecting surface form for xrefs - I tend to default to sequence numbers.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml