<entry id="2133504" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2849298</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>地券紙</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>チケン紙</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ちけんし</reb>
<re_restr>地券紙</re_restr>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>チケンし</reb>
<re_restr>チケン紙</re_restr>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>chikenshi</gloss>
<gloss g_type="expl">type of grey cardboard made from recycled paper</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-05-27 13:00:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>地券紙	198
チケン紙	52
I've come across this word several times in relation to karuta production, e.g. here:
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/1173887/101
p. 181 併し安物には地券紙、黄ボールがしようさてゐる。

reading:
https://ameblo.jp/quilavieum/entry-12322259895.html
https://inuuniq.co.jp/blog/2013/07/post-475.html</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-27 13:20:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Afaik we're trying to avoid constructions like 'variety of', 'type of' etc.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;chikenshi (type of grey cardboard made from recycled paper)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;chikenshi&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;grey cardboard made from recycled paper&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-28 22:53:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>A case where an article helps.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;grey cardboard made from recycled paper&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;a grey cardboard made from recycled paper&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-28 23:15:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think "type of" are fine in expl glosses. 
It's not any grey cardboard made 
from.recycled paper, it's a specific type. "a 
..." conveys the same information, though.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-06 02:48:15" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Isn't "type of ..." better than "a ..." here?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-08-06 04:50:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I guess so.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;a grey cardboard made from recycled paper&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;type of grey cardboard made from recycled paper&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>