<entry id="2128483" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2849949</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>悩める</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>なやめる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1469870">悩む</xref>
<gloss>worried</gloss>
<gloss>troubled</gloss>
<gloss>afflicted</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&v1;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1469840">悩ます</xref>
<misc>&rare;</misc>
<gloss>to afflict</gloss>
<gloss>to torment</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-07-20 10:35:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_refs>smk for sense 1, larger kokugos for sense 2.
In BCCWJ sense 1 occurs more often than sense 2.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-20 12:16:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>悩める seems to inflect very rarely, but when it does it looks more like v1.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ルミナス xrefs to 悩む and 悩ます
悩む	2691186
悩ます	85525
悩める	351724</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1469870"&gt;悩む&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1469840"&gt;悩ます&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-20 12:53:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_detl>sorry, my typo</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +19 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v5m;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v1;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-20 12:58:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_detl>sense 1 doesn't inflect (because it's built on the archaic auxiliary -ri which 
has already been inflected to the rentaikei, -ru) but sense 2 does. Since you 
said that the word rarely inflect, does it mean that sense 2 is obscure? (since 
nayamasu is more common)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-21 01:49:02" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's safe to tag sense 2 like that. The evidence for it being used as a regular verb is slight.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;obsc;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>