<entry id="2124033" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2849877</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>非化石価値取引市場</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ひかせきかちとりひきしじょう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>non-fossil fuel energy value trading market (established in 2018 by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-07-10 16:06:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_refs>https://kotobank.jp/word/%E9%9D%9E%E5%8C%96%E7%9F%B3%E4%BE%A1%E5%80%A4%E5%8F%96%E5%BC%95%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4-1834225
https://tr-ex.me/%E7%BF%BB%E8%A8%B3/%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BA%BA-%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E/%E9%9D%9E%E5%8C%96%E7%9F%B3%E8%A8%BC%E6%9B%B8</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-15 06:39:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think rather than having this uncommon clunky term, better to have an entry for 非化石 and its common compounds.  I have proposed them, and if they are approved we can see where this fits in, if at all.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>0 n-grams for this.
非化石	2210	  
非化石エネルギー	1168	  
非化石燃料	915</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-16 21:13:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It was formed in 2018 so it won't show up in the n-grams. It gets quite a few hits online.
Still, I'm not sure it's worth adding. I wouldn't object if it's rejected.
I've approved those 非化石 submissions.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-16 23:27:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Less necessary now that 非化石 is in, but maybe useful.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>95 real WWW bits</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-17 11:22:15" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Should we include some extra detail to indicate that it's not a general term?
By the way, there's no way to know the true number of hits on Google. Clicking to the last page of results always gives you a small number.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;non-fossil fuel energy value trading market&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;non-fossil fuel energy value trading market (established in 2018 by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-17 11:55:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK.
Yes, Google counts are hopeless, as I've been told by people there, but the relative frequency of the unique snippets can give you a vague idea of the actual quantity.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>