<entry id="2115515" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1097450</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>バイ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&int;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1983760">バイバイ・1</xref>
<gloss>bye</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-09-12 10:32:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>ＫＯＤ追加語彙</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +17,6 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1097840"&gt;バイセクシュアル&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;abbr;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;bisexual&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-12 18:29:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>surely sense 1 shouldn't be a noun (no idea how to code for an english preposition) and sense 2 should be an int?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-13 00:58:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>English dictionaries say "by" is a preposition and adverb. Japanese doesn't have English-style prepositions. I can't find useful examples of it being used in Japanese, so for want of anything better, I'll call it an adverb.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>OED, WN</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;int;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-13 00:58:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I meant to sign this off.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-10 20:21:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Where does sense 1 come from? I'm not seeing it in the refs.
Should the "bisexual" sense be a separate entry?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-13 01:50:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think that's a katakana transcription hangover. Not in references. It can go.
Yes, the others should be split. I'll do that.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-&lt;re_pri&gt;gai1&lt;/re_pri&gt;
@@ -8,4 +6,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;by&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;
@@ -16,6 +10,0 @@
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1097840"&gt;バイセクシュアル&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;abbr;&lt;/misc&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;bisexual&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>