jmdict
1381910
Active
(id:
2107381)
<entry id="2107381" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1381910</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>静寂</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf27</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>せいじゃく</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf27</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<gloss>silence</gloss>
<gloss>stillness</gloss>
<gloss>quietness</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2017-09-08 10:29:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-09 06:06:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Opencooper</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Of my refs, none except koj associate しじま with any kanji. koj has 黙・静寂, but my refs only have 静寂 as
せいじゃく and neither reading for 黙. So I propose splitting しじま out and dropping 黙.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-09 23:31:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, maybe should be split as しじま is probably "uk".</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 has:
しじま【黙・静寂】
stillness; silence; quietude.
and, of course, せいじゃく【静寂】 etc. My other JEs don't have 黙 but do have しじま without kana.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-10 02:57:47" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. Splitting.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>黙</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>静寂</re_restr>
@@ -19,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しじま</reb></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>