JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2849683 Deleted (id: 2107017)
<entry id="2107017" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2849683</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>ヲ格</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ヲかく</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2029010">を・1</xref>
<field>&ling;</field>
<gloss>accusative case (in Japanese)</gloss>
<gloss>wo-case</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-06-24 15:01:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_refs>ヲ格	2865
http://repository.hyogo-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10132/566/1/AN001716670160006.pdf
the accusative (-wo) case
https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D08-1055.pdf
the wo-case (accusative or direct object)
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10015-020-00585-8
“wo-case (“wo-kaku” in Japanese)”</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-25 10:14:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This notation is not particularly common and seems to be mainly used in dictionaries. The list (from the 格文法 Wiki article) shows the ones that get some use. I think if we are to add ヲ格 we should probably also add most or all of the others.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A0%BC%E6%96%87%E6%B3%95#%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%AA%9E%E8%A1%A8%E5%B1%A4%E6%A0%BC
ヲ格	2865
ガ格	14295
ニ格	1690
カラ格	231
ヘ格	64
ト格	62
ヨリ格	45
マデ格	57
デ格	203
を格	5636
が格	33415
に格	28131
Unidic has を格, が格, に格, etc. but the counts may be false positives,</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-26 00:00:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm not sure these terms are worth recording. I'd be fine with ignoring them.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-26 13:27:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I added it due to the high n-gram hits.
Maybe ok to delete -- pretty transparent</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-06 00:52:53" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've agonized for a while. I guess to the people who'd encounter it it's obvious.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml