<entry id="2106987" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1425790</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>仲間</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf02</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>なかま</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf02</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>companion</gloss>
<gloss>fellow</gloss>
<gloss>friend</gloss>
<gloss>mate</gloss>
<gloss>comrade</gloss>
<gloss>partner</gloss>
<gloss>colleague</gloss>
<gloss>coworker</gloss>
<gloss>associate</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>group</gloss>
<gloss>company</gloss>
<gloss>circle</gloss>
<gloss>set</gloss>
<gloss>gang</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>member of the same category (family, class)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-09-01 07:27:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Add other definition “member of the same classification”; 
this is easy to miss.
Heard e.g. in traffic laws, as “cars and bicycles are of the 
same classification” (I wouldn’t call them “comrades”…).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 daijr shinkai</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -28,0 +28,4 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;member of the same classification&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-09-01 07:28:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>(amend wording)</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -30,1 +30,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;member of the same classification&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;member of the same category&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-09-01 18:52:10" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-02 16:38:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's clearer to split out the collective noun glosses into a separate sense, as in prog. Daijs also has a separate "地位・職業などの同じ人々" sense.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;company&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;companion&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;friend&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;mate&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;comrade&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;partner&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -20,0 +25 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;coworker&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -22,5 +26,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;comrade&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;mate&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;group&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;circle of friends&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;partner&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -30 +30,9 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;member of the same category&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;group&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;company&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;circle&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;set&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;gang&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;member of the same category (family, class)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-04 21:19:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'll reopen as sentences need reindexing.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-04 21:20:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-07-05 23:20:01" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've indexed some sentences.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>