jmdict
1394710
Active
(id:
2105956)
<entry id="2105956" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1394710</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>然も無いと</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>然もないと</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>さもないと</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>otherwise</gloss>
<gloss>or else</gloss>
<gloss>if not</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-12-14 19:29:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not a conjunction according to the kokugos.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, koj, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>else</gloss>
-<gloss>if not so</gloss>
+<gloss>or else</gloss>
+<gloss>if not</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-12-14 20:04:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-17 05:13:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Perhaps the removal of the "[conj]" should be revisited? Ditto for さもなくば.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>新明解, 明鏡 - both tag it 〘接〙</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-20 01:03:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, conj is fine. I didn't have access to those kokugos back then.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>