<entry id="2105298" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1834870</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>流れ矢</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ながれや</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>stray arrow</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-06-12 10:19:35" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_refs>https://kotobank.jp/word/%E6%B5%81%E7%9F%A2-658731
The nikk entry indicates that 流矢 can be read as both りゅうし and ながれや.
(Nikk doesn't do okurigana, so the headword ながれ‐や【流矢】 can't be used as evidence, but notice the example sentence from 今昔.)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;流矢&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -8,0 +12,4 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;りゅうし&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_restr&gt;流矢&lt;/re_restr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-14 00:22:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>That example is from 1120. Daijr and daijs only have りゅうし for 流矢. I think we should keep them separate.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;流矢&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -12,4 +8,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;りゅうし&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_restr&gt;流矢&lt;/re_restr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>