jmdict
1661190
Deleted
(id:
2105208)
<entry id="2105208" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1661190</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>泰山</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>岱山</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>太山</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>たいざん</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>large mountain</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-04-23 01:06:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>sense 2 might belong in enamdict only</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>koj. has also written as 太山, but that collides with 大山</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>岱山</keb>
@@ -13 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>Mt Taishan (China)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-pr;</pos>
+<gloss>Mount Tai (China)</gloss>
+<gloss>Taishan</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-04-23 01:31:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i think it can be argued that 太山 belongs in both entries without merging because Taishan appears to be the original meaning for this but not the other entry</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>太山</keb>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-04-23 01:53:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Sense 2 to the names dictionary?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-05-31 23:00:36" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Answering my own question: yes.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,6 +19,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-pr;</pos>
-<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
-<gloss>Mount Tai (China)</gloss>
-<gloss>Taishan</gloss>
-</sense></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-12 06:54:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_detl>can we now merge with 1661190?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-06-13 07:23:21" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think we can now (you meant with 1785260, I suspect.)</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>