<entry id="2102308" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2849111</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>クラトム</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2849110">アヘンボク</xref>
<gloss>kratom (Mitragyna speciosa)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-05-07 14:02:34" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>https://hfnet.nibiohn.go.jp/contents/detail361
4.html</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-07 22:52:19" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>https://jp.drugfreeworld.org/newsletter/issue12/the-truth-about-kratom.html</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2849110"&gt;アヘンボク&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-08 00:06:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>アヘンボク has an obsc tag, this one doesn't. 
should the xref really be pointing from this 
entry, to that one, rather than the other way 
around?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-08 00:33:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>クラトム gets 0 n-grams but I think it's come into fashion a bit in recent years. I put a link to the botanical name entry as I thought it'd be useful to relate them, despite アヘンボク being very rare. I don't mind dropping it, but I think it's harmless. Certainly クラトム is getting more WWW hits than アヘンボク et al.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-12 05:59:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Leave it for now.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>