<entry id="2100128" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2848898</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>処理水</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しょりすい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>treated wastewater</gloss>
<gloss>treated sewage</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-04-13 22:03:33" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>In the news a lot.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.msn.com/ja-jp/news/national/%E5%87%A6%E7%90%86%E6%B0%B4%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AF-%EF%BC%91%E6%97%A5%EF%BC%91%EF%BC%94%EF%BC%90%E3%83%88%E3%83%B3%E7%99%BA%E7%94%9F-%E3%81%9F%E3%81%BE%E3%82%8B%E4%B8%80%E6%96%B9/ar-BB1fCpsX
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56728068</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-13 23:41:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>GG5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;wastewater (esp. from nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;wastewater (e.g. from nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;treated water&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-14 00:27:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I don't know if this second gloss is right. The kind of water they're talking about is definitely not treated; it's contaminated. I think 処理 here refers to the fact that this water was used in the processing of something in the power plant. Either that or this is a bizarre case of a euphemism that means its opposite.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-14 00:58:36" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>https://www.tepco.co.jp/decommission/progress/watertreatment
福島第一原子力発電所で発生する汚染水を浄化処理し、発電所内のタンクで貯蔵している水。
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXKZO48398220Y9A800C1EA2000/
処理水とは 原発事故の汚染水を浄化した後の水</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-14 01:58:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Possibly should be two senses.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5: treated water
Eijiro: treated sewage●treated water
未処理水 : untreated water
Kenchiku: treated sewage/treated wastewater/treated water
etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;treated water&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;treated water&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-14 10:14:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;wastewater (e.g. from nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;wastewater (e.g. from a nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-14 11:55:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;wastewater (e.g. from a nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;treated wastewater (e.g. from a nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-15 02:37:40" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's getting confused. I think it's best kept to a general term, without reference to nuclear plants. As the links Marcus noted indicate, the water from those plants has been treated.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;treated water&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;treated wastewater (e.g. from a nuclear plant)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;treated wastewater&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;treated sewage&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>