<entry id="2099837" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1864360</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>係り結び</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>係結び</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かかりむすび</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&ling;</field>
<gloss>linked form</gloss>
<gloss>bound ending</gloss>
<gloss g_type="expl">postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-03-28 14:26:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_refs>https://kotobank.jp/word/%E4%BF%82%E7%B5%90-43417
https://kotobank.jp/word/%E4%BF%82%E3%82%8A%E7%B5%90%E3%81%B3-824336
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BF%82%E3%82%8A%E7%B5%90%E3%81%B3</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,4 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;connection&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;relation&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;linked form&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;bounded form&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;correlation between binding particles and sentence-final endings in Literary Japanese&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-28 14:50:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_detl>"conjugations" is more accurate</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;correlation between binding particles and sentence-final endings in Literary Japanese&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;correlation between binding particles and sentence-final conjugations in Literary Japanese&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-29 00:13:21" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The original was rather inadequate, and your proposed correction is welcome. I like to lead with shorter glosses, and I think this succinct explanation gets to the point. With "verb agreement" there's no need to say conjugation specifically.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5: 【国文法】 a linked form; (a) bound ending.
ルミナス: 〔言〕 postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese [U]　★説明的な訳.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;correlation between binding particles and sentence-final conjugations in Literary Japanese&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;linked form&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;bound ending&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-29 01:31:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>dine</upd_name>
<upd_detl>係り結び refers to a grammatical phenomenon or rule,
as the kokugos imply, so "linked form; bound ending"
is not accurate.
For example, the 未然形 ending -a is also bound,
but we do not call it 係り結び.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.academia.edu/3228978/Non_movement_and_kakari_musubi_in_Old_
Japanese
kakari-musubi is a syntactic pattern in which a so-called kakari-
particle triggers a particular form of the main-clause predicate of a 
sentence.

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/gengo1939/2000/118/2000_118_81/_pd
f/-char/en
Kakari musubi is a set of syntactic constructions in which so-called 
kakari particles, inserted sentence-medially, link to a non-conclusive</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-29 03:47:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think "linked form; bound ending" are actually wrong; it's more that they are trying to give short general translations without describing in detail what actually happens with a 係り結び. I think GG5 would have been better including a slightly longer explanation as well, but I guess for most dictionary users it's a minor and arcane term.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-04-10 12:01:21" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>No further comments. Closing.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>