<entry id="2098609" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1316040</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>時期</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf01</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>じき</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf01</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<gloss>time</gloss>
<gloss>season</gloss>
<gloss>period</gloss>
<gloss>phase</gloss>
<gloss>stage</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-03-02 19:28:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>winnie</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/%E6%99%82%E6%9C%9F</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,0 +22,2 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;phase&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;stage&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-03-03 21:41:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>ref for sense 2?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-03-04 23:34:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Paul Blay questioned this when it was proposed in 2006. Seems to be a 変換ミス for 直(じき). Should be recorded somewhere, and possibly better as an iK in the 直(じき) with restrictions, although that would be messy.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>http://d.hatena.ne.jp/hirochan0406/20060907 (example of 時期分かる meaning "soon find out".)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-03-07 00:42:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. xref to real term</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1581790"&gt;直・じき・1&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-10-30 23:22:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think sense 1 is just a regular noun. Can't see evidence of adverbial usage.
----------
Sense 2 is definitely a 変換ミス and I question the need for keeping it. It's not colloquial, just a mistake - the type anyone would notice if they bothered to read back what they'd written.

As far as I can tell, it's not even that common. I propose we drop it.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-t;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-10-31 04:42:10" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Sure. It wasn't that strongly supported back in 2007 when it was added.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -24,8 +23,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1581790"&gt;直・じき・1&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;col;&lt;/misc&gt;
-&lt;s_inf&gt;poss. typo for 直(じき)&lt;/s_inf&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;soon&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;shortly&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-02-25 18:52:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Edward Coventry</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Adding n-adv is consistent with Unidic</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Unidic classifies as 名詞, 普通名詞, 副詞可能, -&gt; Noun, Common Noun, Adverb-able</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-02-28 05:11:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-31 04:34:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>