<entry id="2097994" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2828961</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>掻敷</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>皆敷</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>苴</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>搔敷</keb>
<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かいしき</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>leaf, branch with leaves, or paper placed under a serving dish or offering</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2016-03-22 18:52:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>苴	84
掻敷	4
皆敷	2</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>koj daijirin</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-03-23 05:22:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-20 14:06:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Tyler Winn</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>wonder if that's from a different freq list or if ngrams was updated</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>大辞林３

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
苴	2295
掻敷	286
皆敷	122
搔敷	No matches</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;搔敷&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;oK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-20 21:08:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Scott was quoting a different set.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-21 11:07:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Tyler Winn</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Maybe should move 苴 towards the back? Scrolling through google images, I think it's getting 
a bunch of false positives from various things like kanji dictionaries, 苞苴, chinese, etc

the other three forms seem a lot more more relevant</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>大辞林３: かい しき [0]【▼搔敷・皆敷・▼苴】
デジタル大辞泉: かい‐しき【×掻敷／皆敷／×苴】
広辞苑６: かい‐しき【苴・掻敷・皆敷】</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-26 23:56:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, it probably should. That matches the kokugos. The gloss is a bit clunky.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;苴&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;苴&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>