<entry id="2097993" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2843814</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>おばあちゃん子</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>お婆ちゃん子</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>お祖母ちゃん子</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>おばあちゃんこ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>child who loves their grandmother</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>child who is doted on by their grandmother</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-03-23 07:29:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Alan Cheng</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>see 2843807</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>お祖母ちゃん子	279
おばあちゃん子	11369</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-03-23 11:16:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-24 03:03:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>おばあちゃん子	11369
おばあちゃんっ子	4298

should we add っ子 here? (as we did in the お母さんっ子 entry)

(there's also 
おじいちゃん子	3247
おじいちゃんっ子	1273
which we should maybe add)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;お婆ちゃん子&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-26 23:33:40" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think we should. Done.
I wondered about the (お)じいちゃん子 equivalents but they're not as common.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-26 23:40:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Sorry, I was a little unclear. I meant "should it be added to this entry?" because お母さんっ子 and お母さん子 are in the same entry.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-26 23:46:44" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I was unclear too. In 2019 I thought putting the っ versions in was sort-of OK; now I favor splitting them.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>