<entry id="2088980" stat="R" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2438200</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>打刀</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>うちがたな</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1446420">刀・1</xref>
<xref type="see" seq="1446420">刀・1</xref>
<xref type="see" seq="1446420">刀・1</xref>
<gloss>katana (var. of Japanese long sword)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2009-04-10 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-15 22:20:30" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1446420"&gt;刀&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1446420"&gt;刀・1&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-28 06:48:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>the original gloss was confusing.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uchigatana</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;katana&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;var. of Japanese long sword&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;uchigatana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-28 21:07:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Alan</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Show me any source, that shows the difference between an uchigatana/打刀, and a katana (as in the English term "katana". Not the Japanese かたな), or in any other way, credibly explains how or why uchigatana should be regarded as different, or separate, to katana.

All the information on uchigatana, are perfect descriptions of katana.
Nothing more, nothing less.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;uchigatana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;katana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-29 20:29:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>as per previous referenced edit</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;katana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;uchigatana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-30 04:09:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Alan</upd_name>
<upd_detl>&gt;as per previous referenced edit
*simply reverts change*

…
So we're at kindergarten level, now, are we?
I guess I shouldn't be surprised to see this, from someone who has shown himself to simply be a troll, but I still am.
Even with all the obviously bad, even terrible, behaviour that has been accepted here:
Is this, so OBVIOUSLY inappropriate and immature action, really something that can be accepted behaviour, here?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;uchigatana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;katana (var. of Japanese long sword)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-11-30 04:18:36" stat="R">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>