<entry id="2084688" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2113440</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>イカチー</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
<xref type="see">厳い・1</xref>
<misc>&sl;</misc>
<gloss>grim</gloss>
<gloss>stern</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-12-04 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-16 16:43:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think this is needed. The are countless slangy forms of adjectives that we don't bother with and this isn't even a common example.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams: 636</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +9 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1262510"&gt;厳い&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see"&gt;厳い・1&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-20 00:30:30" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I felt that 636 was a high enough count to warrant keeping it, but on checking links I see very few are relevant.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>